Key Study Findings - Patient Information

Here's a look at some of our most compelling and significant studies demonstrating that using the INVOS® System on adults, children, infants and neonates can make a positive difference.

Study Shows Improved Outcomes

  • A clinical study of 200 coronary artery bypass (CAB) patients1 showed that patients who received active INVOS® System monitoring experienced a decrease in the combined incidence of stroke, ventilation time, sternal infection, kidney failure, re-operation and death within 30 days.
  • In medicine, this group of cumulative adverse conditions is known as Major Organ Morbidity or Mortality (MOMM)2.
  • Only 3% of the patients who received active INVOS® System monitoring experienced one or more of the complications that constitute MOMM - instead of 11% in the unmonitored group. According to the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS), MOMM is at 13.4%!
  • INVOS® System-monitored patients also had a shorter ICU stay and fewer, prolonged brain-oxygen deficits.

Footnotes:
1. Murkin JM, et al. Anesth Analg. 2007 Jan;104(1):51-8.
2. Shroyer AL, et al. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003;Jun:75(6):1856-64.

Stroke and Prolonged Ventilation Were Reduced


  • A large study on over 2,000 cardiac surgery patients found that INVOS® System monitoring helped reduce the stroke rate, ventilation time and hospital length of stay.
  • These statistically-significant results were achieved despite the fact that the INVOS® System monitored group contained much sicker patients.
  • Just think: these benefits were possible because of the aid of a simple, pain-free monitor!

Footnotes:
1. Goldman et al. Heart Surgery Forum 2004;7(5):E376-81.
2. Goldman et al. Presented at Outcomes 2005, May 19-22, Key West.

Study Shows Shorter Hospital Stay


  • This clinical study on relatively healthy, elderly patients undergoing abdominal surgery showed that those patients with a brain oxygenation problem who received interventions by their care team left the hospital a whole lot sooner than those who did not receive interventions: 10 days versus 24 days. That's a 58% shorter hospital stay!
  • Plus, those who did not receive interventions to correct their oxygen imbalance also scored lower on the post-op Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), a reflection of brain function.
  • This study showed that one in five patients - 20% - experienced a cerebral oxygenation problem detected by the INVOS® System.
  • Pulse oximetry, a standard vital sign, did not indicate these critical oxygenation problems.
  • Corrective interventions made to the patients were as simple as adjusting anesthesia dosage.

Footnote:
Casati A, et al. Anesth Analg. 2005 Sep;101(3):740-7.

INVOS® System is Safe, Reliable and Pain-free



Sick children and babies have to undergo enough invasive tests. With the INVOS® System, there are no needle pokes. Sensors simply adhere to the skin like a BandAid®.

  • This clinical study on pediatric patients showed that noninvasive INVOS® System data could be used to predict changes in SvO2 - an invasive test performed with a needle to help determine if a patient's whole-body oxygen balance is at healthy levels.
  • The investigators state that INVOS® System technology "addresses a number of the limitations of SvO2 monitoring." For instance, the INVOS® System is noninvasive and can identify the oxygenation levels in up to four distinct organ beds.
  • Safe, reliable and pain-free monitoring makes care teams and patients breathe easier.

Footnote:
Hoffman GM et al. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Pediatr Card Surg Annu. 2005:12-21.

We're Keeping Infants Safer After Surgery

  • This clinical study showed that brain injury can occur or worsen in the period shortly after an infant's surgery.
  • The ability to detect and correct low brain oxygen levels is crucial to improving safety.
  • Using the INVOS® System to detect oxygenation problems may reduce subsequent neurological challenges.
  • This study found that brain oxygen monitoring after surgery is as important as monitoring during surgery.
Footnote
Dent CL, et al. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006 Jan;131(1):190-7.